Categorized | Council Tax, Court Appearances, Videos

English Freeman Challenges Authority In UK Court …

Posted on 24 March 2010 by admin

Here we see English Freemen standing in court as Lay Advisors to another Freemen.

This is for a Council Tax Liability Order hearing in Cwmbran Magistrates Court in South Wales, There were 14 Freemen in attendance.

The court was never convened as the Freemen never handed jurisdiction to magistrates or the clerk by standing up when ordered to do so and the magistrates never sat down.

The magistrates twice abandoned the court (the ship) and it was the Freemen who called the Police and at one point the Lay advisor can clearly be heard calling attending Police Constables to arrest the magistrates for impersonating judges.

There were many criminal acts committed this day by the company personnel (Magistrates, solicitors, security and the clerk) and Police complaints are under way pending prosecutions for Fraud among other things.

But for the real shocker of how these people think they are above the law …

Watch until the end!

Tags | , , , , , , , , , ,

42 Responses to “English Freeman Challenges Authority In UK Court …”

  1. martin wilson says:

    after watching the “court” video i have the up most respekt for you nice 1 mate.

  2. shiva8 says:

    i think what your doing is great for the world and to start pushing civilization back on track because self ego has destroyed the world.I am new into common law and recently joined the freedomrebels website i am keen to try spread the message and learn as much as possible,its just so positvive to see there are so many people taking an intrest in gaining there true freedom back thankyou for taking that action

  3. Mick Kehoe says:

    Absolutely ground breaking Ray.A massive step to providing proof that the freeman route works.
    This really is a most valuable resource and one to take inspiration from.
    I thank you for providing this for us.
    Thanks
    Mick.

  4. heimdall says:

    Absolutelty brilliant. You have earned the respect of many with your determined stance. I watch this over and over again. I;m refusing to pay my CT bill this year. I started out with good intentions last year but gave in when they sent the liability order. Now igorance of the system is not an excuse. I’ll keep you posted how I get on. Now we need to get the message out wider and wider…….my good wishes and sincere thanks for what you have shown us.

  5. heimdall says:

    A question for you – what if anything has happened since that court appearance? Is that the end of the matter? One thing I am not sure of is can a council now try and get the court to get the money by some other means; earnings or benefits arrestment or bank account arrestment? Thanks and good luck.

  6. Jan says:

    Hi Raymond, You rock n roll!
    I’ve had enough of the council tax scam along with the income tax etc its bleeding me dry I have no spare money left over.. I’ve been self employed for over 20 years, I’m a law abiding human/natural being.. can you represent me? I live in Cwmbran..

  7. Jan says:

    I’m still paying council tax by direct debit at the moment but want to stop the payment I just need to be represented when it goes to court.. I’m just dipping my toe in the water at the present time as I don’t feel I know enough to be able to side step their manipulation of words. Can you put me in touch with your crew in Cwmbran Ray?
    Many Thanks:)

  8. RobbaDong says:

    Raymond, you really are an inspiration! You’ve awakened me to common law. I was already aware and agitated about the unjust/dictatorial running of this country; common law seems like a tool to help start the fightback.

    Keep up the good work, Rob.

  9. Steve says:

    There are no words to express my thanks and admiration Ray.

    I have been waiting 40 years for this scam of authority to be revealed for what it is and had lots of bumps on the way. The conditioning never ever worked on me fully, I just could’t see how they were doing it.

    Thank you, thank you, thank you

    My eyes have been opened, at last

    Steve

    • admin says:

      Hi Steve – thanks for your kind comments but not necessary – we are just a bunch of ordinary people pissed off enough to say NO and simply turn our backs on their stupid and unlawful systems – if we all turn away – 180 degrees – what can they do – they can’t put us all in Prison! Have you joined us over on http://www.FreedomRebels.co.uk – over 1700 members there all willing to help and assist. Regards Ray

  10. jimbobwalton says:

    Hello Ray
    From what I have seen the liability order was granted so I fail to see what has been achived at the moment.
    The Council sought a liability order and got one.

    I noticed you were acting as a lay advisor on behalf of someone else.
    Is there a video of you acting for yourself when you won your own case in relation to council tax payment?

    I take it you dont pay council tax.

    JB

  11. Never heard of the the fat bloke with glasses but i, ll shake his hand and buy him a drink

  12. kevanf1 says:

    This was wonderful seeing the law being used correctly. I am not an anarchist and I do have the utmost respect for the law. However, far too often the law is used as an excuse by those who we, the common people, put into power to tyrannise us. Laws are are, or should be, made to protect the common man not to be abused at the whim of councils, MP’s and the supposed custodians of the law the police force.

    Well done, you guys are the modern day heroes of society.

  13. Jim_Chem says:

    So you do all this to get off paying council tax?

    I hope that you dont use any of the services that it pays for.

    Your probably the same type who moans if the council removes services to cut costs.

    • admin says:

      For someone who doesn’t know me you make some pretty wild assumptions fella!.

      I do this because amongst other things, Council Tax is unlawful and if you spent as much time researching that as you appear to making asinine remarks you might actually learn what I and thousands of others who are NOT paying Council Tax know.

      I am not opposed to a community charge where its FAIR and EQUTIABLE, however I am not ever going to support a TAX, that is UNLAWFUL, used for gain and profit by the greedy and 24% of which lines copper bottomed pension funds to keep lazy tossers in their dotage at our expense.

      AH! Perhaps you work for the council – that would be enough to make anyone bitter and twisted!

      have a nice day!

  14. Ogri says:

    Fascinating to watch, as their cosy little world of privilege crumbles around them. They really do appear to be automata who are simply not programmed for this kind of eventuality; being confronted by someone who has peeked behind the curtain (as in The Wizard of Oz) and knows the truth.

  15. sjg9 says:

    I’m sorry but legally none of this makes any sense. Are you saying that statutory law is only law if you consent to abide by it? If so, that is tosh.

    Common law and statutory law run side by side. And this is not the commercial court.

    I’m all for a bit of anarchy but this is just a waste of court time, taxpayer money and the last 20 mins of my life.

    • admin says:

      Thats EXACTLY what we are saying as we know this to be true – clearly you haven’t even begun to research what we know to be fact, I would suggest you being at the beginning with The Magna Carta 1297, Articles 39 & 61. The Magna Carta was brought into force LONG before the parliament and cannot be repealed or overwritten by any parliament.

      Another word you should look up is JURISDICTION and then ask Freemen which jurisdiction they are in. They are CERTAINLY not in the Jurisdiction of Statute or Legislation which, as Blacks Law Dictionary clearly states “Have no FORCE OF LAW unless the “Governed” CONSENT to them having that force of law”

      Research – before debunking is always a good idea.

  16. kevanf1 says:

    I believe our problem, today, is that we are all brainwashed to blithely accept whatever is told to us by those in authority. This is of course not helped by 99% of us not being able to actually understand what the various laws really mean. The police certainly don’t know as they far too often try to use a law to suit there own purpose. Problem there is that we, the general public, end up losing our liberty even if only for a short period of time while there is clarification. That’s one reason the ‘Plain English’ organisation was set up with their ‘crystal Mark’.

  17. David says:

    I find all these shenanigans highly amusing,
    but I cannot see why you think there is some merit lauding Magna Carta and Norman feudal law. Are you seriously suggesting William the Conqueror had a legitimate right to the throne of England? Are you suggesting England had a right to annexe Cornwall, Wales and Ireland?
    I’d urge all true brothers to reject this evil Norman feudal dominon and its so-called “freemen”. Norman “law” has no place on these islands.

    • admin says:

      “True Brothers” – of what?? – clearly you are some sort of shill sent here by your puppeteers to try and deter us from the path that some of us have studied for years. If you are not aware of the importance of Magna Carta in these modern times then you REALLY need to go back and study history my friend! – Now, if you want to have a sensible debate without the snide comments then fine – if not then I won’t be publishing any more of your nonsense!

  18. SaddiqKhan says:

    Inspiring Stand and fantastic work! East London ready to join the ranks.

  19. David says:

    I am a native celt and I asked you a perfectly straightforward question: are you suggesting William the Conqueror had a legitimate claim to the throne of England? And that his Norman “robber barons” had a right to annexe Cornwall, Wales and Ireland and subject it to ‘laws’ such as Magna Carta, which enshrined the right of robber barons to enact their feudal dominion over the native peasantry?
    If your answers are “Yes” and “Yes”, then at least we know where you stand.
    If your answers are “No” and “No”, then I put it to you that your entire logical system is fundamentally flawed.

  20. taz says:

    For you information david, the magna carta was brought in by the people for the people, so that they had more rights. this was “forced” upon the King. If you cannot bother to do your homework, I’ll do it for you:-

    “Magna Carta was the first document forced onto an English King by a group of his subjects (the barons) in an attempt to limit his powers by law and protect their privileges”

    (Source Wikipedia)

  21. David says:

    Taz, the Norman Robber Barons were not “the people” of England. They were a bunch of marauding renegades who invaded England in 1066AD, butchered the Saxon nobility, and usurped rule over the native peasantry. Magna Carta simply stopped the chief bully (the King) bullying his cronies (the Barons) quite so much. It was not about right for the common people, who were not “freemen” under the feudal system of the time.
    Some useful background reading:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robber_baron
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_invasion_of_England

  22. David, Are you suggesting that the Saxons, or perhaps even the Briton Khumry ( Cimmerians) were the original people of the British Isles, or perhaps the Picts? The home of the Saxons were the Caucasus, and they too pillaged, raped, murdered, marauded, and invaded their way from the Caucasus through north-west Europe ( like the Welsh) and not that long before the Normans did the same from somewhat different quarters… The only truly autochthonous member of the human race was Adam, and even he was exiled…..Feudalism is not the question nor the answer nor the issue.. The Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights of 1689 and matters pertaining to the Constitution are the issues; not social systems… Regards, Peter
    The Next Strategy magazine,
    Australia….

  23. conrad606 says:

    hello ray ,been watching your freeman antics:-)…great stuff. i am actually in bristol magistrates on monday,and am gonna fight my corner using common law,just hope i dont get railroaded,will have to keep my wits about me:-))……..cheers don

    • admin says:

      Sorry I didnt answer this that quickly been mad busy with lots of stuff. Tell us how it went.

      • dmc says:

        hello,well prior to this court summons,i had returned the summons with a court rebuttal notice,and heard nothing back,(i have already read somewhere that the councils send out their own summons’s),so i turned up on the day,and there was NO record of my hearing!and my name was not even on their computer system,so i came out and came home,a few days later i had a letter from the council saying i still owed the money,and that i could use an AFFORDABLE REPAYMENT PLAN or if i ignore this then my account will be passed to BAILIFFS ,. i think they are clutching at straws now ,so they can do what they like,i will not be paying and i am not concerned about bailiffs(debt collectors)knocking on my door as i have NO CONTRACT with them either..


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


ACPO and Bedfordshire Police Chichester District Council Chichester Magistrates Chief Constable Bedfordshire Police Corrupt Councils Councill Tax Council Ta County Council Cwmbran Court Video cwmbran video English Freeman in Court Fabian Agenda FMOTL Freedom Rebels FreedomRebels.co.uk Freeman in Court Freeman on the freeman on the land Gloucester Council Tax Gloucester Court Video Home Offfice Home Secretary Jack Straw Liability Orders magistrates oath Mulsims Nanny State Police Abuse Police Brutality police constables oath Police Favouritism Police Lies Police Misinformation Police State raymond St.Clair raymondstclair.com Ray St ray st.clair social networking south wales police Susse the cwmbran 10 TPUC.org

Pages

Archives

Google Friends

Hot Topics